Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 94(12): 1056-1063, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37434321

RESUMO

Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is a disabling long-term condition of unknown cause. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published a guideline in 2021 that highlighted the seriousness of the condition, but also recommended that graded exercise therapy (GET) should not be used and cognitive-behavioural therapy should only be used to manage symptoms and reduce distress, not to aid recovery. This U-turn in recommendations from the previous 2007 guideline is controversial.We suggest that the controversy stems from anomalies in both processing and interpretation of the evidence by the NICE committee. The committee: (1) created a new definition of CFS/ME, which 'downgraded' the certainty of trial evidence; (2) omitted data from standard trial end points used to assess efficacy; (3) discounted trial data when assessing treatment harm in favour of lower quality surveys and qualitative studies; (4) minimised the importance of fatigue as an outcome; (5) did not use accepted practices to synthesise trial evidence adequately using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations trial evidence); (6) interpreted GET as mandating fixed increments of change when trials defined it as collaborative, negotiated and symptom dependent; (7) deviated from NICE recommendations of rehabilitation for related conditions, such as chronic primary pain and (8) recommended an energy management approach in the absence of supportive research evidence.We conclude that the dissonance between this and the previous guideline was the result of deviating from usual scientific standards of the NICE process. The consequences of this are that patients may be denied helpful treatments and therefore risk persistent ill health and disability.


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica , Humanos , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Terapia por Exercício
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(10)2021 Oct 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34645623

RESUMO

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is common in general medical settings, and can usually be treated with conventional oral antidepressants. For some patients, however, oral treatment is refused or not possible, and the untreated symptoms can have a significant impact on the treatment of the acute medical problem. Use of intravenous ketamine has been widely reported in mental health settings for the treatment of MDD. We describe use of intravenous ketamine in a general medical hospital for the treatment of MDD in an 83-year-old male patient who refused food, fluid and medical investigations following a stroke.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Transtorno Depressivo Resistente a Tratamento , Ketamina , Administração Intravenosa , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo Resistente a Tratamento/tratamento farmacológico , Hospitais , Humanos , Ketamina/uso terapêutico , Masculino
3.
J R Soc Med ; 113(10): 394-402, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32930040

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Cognitive behavioural therapy is commonly used to treat chronic fatigue syndrome and has been shown to be effective for reducing fatigue and improving physical functioning. Most of the evidence on the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome is from randomised control trials, but there are only a few studies in naturalistic treatment settings. Our aim was to examine the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in a naturalistic setting and examine what factors, if any, predicted outcome. DESIGN: Using linear mixed effects analysis, we analysed patients' self-reported symptomology over the course of treatment and at three-month follow-up. Furthermore, we explored what baseline factors were associated with improvement at follow-up. SETTING: Data were available for 995 patients receiving cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome at an outpatient clinic in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were referred consecutively to a specialist unit for chronic fatigue or chronic fatigue syndrome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were assessed throughout their treatment using self-report measures including the Chalder Fatigue Scale, 36-item Short Form Health Survey, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Global Improvement and Satisfaction. RESULTS: Patients' fatigue, physical functioning and social adjustment scores significantly improved over the duration of treatment with medium to large effect sizes (|d| = 0.45-0.91). Furthermore, 85% of patients self-reported that they felt an improvement in their fatigue at follow-up and 90% were satisfied with their treatment. None of the regression models convincingly predicted improvement in outcomes with the best model being (R2 = 0.137). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' fatigue, physical functioning and social adjustment all significantly improved following cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in a naturalistic outpatient setting. These findings support the growing evidence from previous randomised control trials and suggest that cognitive behavioural therapy could be an effective treatment in routine treatment settings.


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Emoções/fisiologia , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/terapia , Nível de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Autorrelato , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
4.
Transplantation ; 98(11): 1182-9, 2014 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25099701

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Unspecified (nondirected altruistic) kidney donation is becoming increasingly common in the United Kingdom. Questions regarding motivation and characteristics of these donors persist, alongside concerns about regret and long-term psychosocial outcomes. The aims of this study were to compare psychosocial and physical outcomes in unspecified kidney donors (UKDs) versus specified kidney donors (SKDs). METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study, in which a detailed assessment of psychosocial outcomes was made using validated questionnaires. Additional questions specific to donation were also asked, including questions regarding motivation, regret, and anonymity. RESULTS: One hundred ninety responses were received from 296 participants studied (110 UKDs [74.3%] vs. 80 SKDs [54.1%], P<0.001). Unspecified kidney donors were older (54 years vs. 44 years; P<0.001), predominantly white (99.1% vs. 78.5%; P<0.001), and donated more recently (1.3 years vs. 2.6 years; P<0.001). There was no difference in psychiatric history or personality type, or current depression, anxiety, stress, self-esteem, or well-being between the groups (P>0.05). Unspecified kidney donors were more engaged in other altruistic behaviours (P<0.001). There was no difference in physical outcomes, although UKDs recovered quicker (P<0.001). Regret was low (3.7% UKDs vs. 7.5% SKDs; P=0.078). CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that UKDs have comparable physical and psychosocial outcomes to SKDs. These favorable outcomes may be, in part, because of the rigorous evaluation process which currently includes a mental health assessment. We conclude that the program can continue to expand safely across the United Kingdom.


Assuntos
Altruísmo , Transplante de Rim/ética , Doadores Vivos/psicologia , Motivação , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia , Autoimagem , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido , Adulto Jovem
10.
Acad Psychiatry ; 29(3): 310-5, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16141130

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In the United Kingdom (UK), an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has replaced the individual patient assessment (IPA) for part 1 of the membership examination of the Royal College of Psychiatrists (MRCPsych). The authors' assessment of the OSCE was conducted. METHOD: Residents completed and evaluated an OSCE designed according to guidelines set by the Royal College of Psychiatrists. RESULTS: These residents considered the OSCE fair (86%) and appropriate (89%) in assessing clinical ability. They believed that the OSCE reflected the skills required in clinical practice and found it preferable to the IPA. CONCLUSION: The OSCE received positive evaluation from residents.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Psiquiatria/educação , Psiquiatria/organização & administração , Educação/organização & administração , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...